|
China: Economic and Financial
Dichotomy
China keeps amazing us. We’ve already
gotten used to its astounding economic growth -- last year the
Chinese economy grew at a rate of about 10%. This accomplishment
comes on the heals of a similar performance the previous years,
probably the most sustained economic growth in modern history, as the
chart below demonstrates.
Data
compiled by Hitotsubashi University (Japan)
For investors around the
world, even more impressive was the performance of the Chinese stock
markets. In 2006 the Chinese stock market grew extremely fast, by
some estimates (Dow Jones China Index, Shanghai Stock Exchange
Composite Index) at a rate of approximately 100%. The Morgan Stanley
Capital International China Index went up by 79 percent. By
any measure, in 2006, the Chinese stock market
grew faster than any major stock market in the world. In addition,
the Chinese markets reached another milestone: the total
capitalization of the Shanghai and Shenzen stock exchanges reached
one trillion dollars.
Unfortunately for many investors, last year’s
performance was an exception rather than a rule. For a number of
years the Chinese stock market was a laggard. Below, for example, is
a chart of the Shanghai Stock Exchange Composite Index from 2000
through 2005:
Source:
Shanghai Stock Exchanges
The average return for these years was
approximately -3.7% (that is negative 3.7% annualized), despite the
fact that during this period the Chinese economy was growing at a
rate of about 9% on average, faster than any large economy. Even if
we took a look back even further, we would see that historically,
Chinese exchanges were performing sub-par. The Shanghai Stock
Exchange index doesn’t go back further than January of 2000,
but Dow Jones was collecting data on Chinese markets for 13 years,
from January 1994. Here’s a more historical view of Chinese
stocks using Dow Jones China 88 Index.
Source:
Dow Jones and Company
We can see that the index was higher in 1997 than
it is today. The average annual return during the last 14 years was
a paltry 5%. For comparison, the S&P 500 grew by approximately
11% (total return). This seems counterintuitive: how is it possible
that for many years the economy was growing extremely fast but the
stock market was not? The answer, of course, is that the stock
market does not price “the economy.” The market is
mainly concerned with profits, interest rates, and taxes. During
this period, the inflation rate in China was pretty low (for example,
1.8% in 2005). Likewise, corporate taxes are reasonable, varying
from 15% to 33%, depending on whether the enterprise is located in a
preferential economic zone or not. The problem then, is profits.
The Chinese economy is a mixture of private and
state-owned enterprises. The state-owned companies do work for the
benefit of the majority owner, the state. The state does not
necessarily seek purely financial benefits, however. Frequently, the
primary goal is in keeping full employment and social stability.
Because of this, the state very often subsidizes inefficient
enterprises. It usually does so through the banks, most of which are
also partially state owned and whose stocks usually trade at a
discount compared to similar-sized Western banks. Private companies,
on the other hand, very often see the goal as increased market share,
not increased profits. They keep the prices of their goods
artificially low, even as the cost of their resources (oil prices,
labor costs) goes up. Though the revenues and the sheer size of
these companies grow, they are often not very profitable. Investors,
in turn, price their stock accordingly. The induced lending to
inefficient state enterprises has saddled the banks with large
non-performing loans.
During the 2005 – 2006 year, the Chinese
government attempted to clean up the banking system. In an attempt
to instill market discipline, it privatized several big state banks,
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China being the largest of them.
In order to make their shares more attractive, the government wiped
out a large portion of the bank’s non-performing loans prior to
the initial public offering. The privatization constituted a huge
transfer of wealth from taxpayers to investors. Goldman Sachs, Inc.,
which participated in the offering, apparently made about $4 Billion
dollars in the transaction.
Of course, individual investors cannot get in on
such insider deals. Still, they could have received excellent
returns had they invested in China-related funds during 2006.
Nonetheless,, investors face the question: was 2006 a fluke or did it
manifest some fundamental changes in the Chinese markets? What can
we expect in the future? There are several factors to consider:
Will China continue its economic reforms or will a more conservative
group come to power in this one-party country and attempt to
re-centralize the economy, as is happening in Russia? Will the
rampant corruption adversely affect economic development? Will China
manage to maintain social stability, even as the gap between the rich
and the poor continues to grow?
Although we don’t know the answers to these
basic questions, there are a couple of key factors that may, to some
extent, illuminate the situation. The Chinese government keeps the
currency, Yuan, artificially low so that its export-oriented economy
continues to perform – and in the process continues to employ
millions of workers. The trade surplus with the United States is
growing, prompting the US government to pressure the Chinese to
revalue the Yuan. Even though the Chinese are very reluctant to let
the Yuan grow, they do let it fluctuate within a rather narrow band.
It is probably safe to assume, therefore, that in the near future the
Yuan will continue to appreciate against the dollar, thus adding to
the total returns on Chinese funds. Also, it seems that at least for
now, the more pragmatic faction of the Chinese Communist Party will
retain control, thereby allowing growth to continue.
What are the vehicles the US
investor could use to invest in Chinese stocks? There are several
closed-end funds, such as The China Fund (NYSE symbol CHN), The
Greater China Fund (GCH), and Templeton Dragon Fund (TDF). There are
also two Exchange-Traded Funds: FXI, which, according to the
prospectus, seeks investment results that correspond generally
to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the
FTSE/Xinhua China 25 index; and PGJ, which seeks results that
correspond generally to the price and yield (before the Fund's fees
and expenses) of an equity index called the Halter USX China
index(SM). Also, there are a number of mutual fund companies created
funds, which invest in Chinese and Hong Kong stocks.
As any investment, these vehicles are risky,
probably more so than some domestic funds, as they carry additional
political and exchange rate risks. Nevertheless, investors may
consider them in order to diversify their holdings and participate in
this large and potentially growing market space.
©2006 Zaks Investment Advisory Service, LLC. All rights reserved.
|