|
Economic and Financial Transformations in the Modern World
Last
time, we concluded our program by stating the following useful fact:
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) allow regular investors to perform
investment strategies that, until recently, were only accessible to
professionals. For example, they may now invest in a wide universe
of foreign stocks. Here, I must digress a bit and talk about the
international economy and stock market growth over the past 15 years.
With
the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, the collapse of the Soviet Union
in 1991, and Deng Xiaoping’s 1992 reforms in China, the global
economy underwent radical change. Nearly 300 million citizens of the
former Soviet Union, 120 million people from the Eastern Bloc, and
1.2 billion residents of China were suddenly rushed from planned,
socialist economies into near-market or in some cases fully-market
ones. And this transformation occurred in just a few years, or
measured in a historical time frame, almost instantly. All of these
untold millions of people, who had lived under planned economies for
the preceding decades mostly producing things that they were ordered
to produce by the planning committees, were suddenly producing things
that people actually needed! Their labor efficiency multiplied
several-fold. And even though almost all of these countries
underwent very difficult transition periods, after a few years, their
economies began to grow. Moreover, most of these countries organized
their own stock markets, where shares of local private companies
began to trade. Just like the economies, many of these exchanges
began to quickly grow. In 1992, the total capitalization of all the
Chinese exchanges was close to zero. Right now, it stands at nearly
three trillion dollars. The capitalization of the Russian exchanges,
which did not even exist in 1992, is now about one trillion dollars.
(Just for comparison’s sake: the market capitalization of all
the US stock markets is near 20 trillion dollars.).
Of
course, just like their economies, the stocks markets of nearly every
developing nation experience numerous difficulties. Many of the
economies are market only in name, while in practice remain largely
controlled by the state. Most of these countries are ridden by
corruption (with the exceptions of Slovenia, Estonia, and to a lesser
extent, some of the other Eastern European countries). Stock market
price are often subject to manipulation by the insiders and the
state. In many countries, the ruling regimes have allowed the
so-called oligarchs to expropriate the most productive assets. And
yet, compared to their old planned states, all of these countries
became incomparably more productive, and consequently, people’s
standards of life grew.
Moreover,
transitions to semi-free, near-market systems did not benefit the
people of these nations alone. They also helped the developed ones:
the United States and Western Europe. The fact of the matter is that
most of the developing countries would have been unable to emerge
from their economic crises, which planned economics provoked, by
relying solely on their domestic markets: these markets were simply
too small. But, to their fortune, we live in an era of global
economics. Almost all of these countries found something they could
export to the more developed and richer nations. China and other
countries of Southeast Asia are exporting an enormous amount of
consumer and so-called low-tech goods. Russia exports oil, natural
gas, metal and timber. India exports information technology. Brazil
– iron ore, coffee and other agricultural products. Eastern
European countries are exporting goods produced in factories that
Western firms built there to efficiently use the local cheap labor
force. As a result, many of the products and services that were once
produced inside developed nations by an expensive labor force are now
being produced in emerging markets and sold to developed countries at
lower prices. On the one hand, this has resulted in a loss of some
jobs in the United States and Western Europe. But one of the
economic features of the developed nations is their flexibility:
almost all of these countries were able to quickly adjust and move to
production of more high-tech goods, and more sophisticated services.
For this reason, fewer people in the developed nations are now
involved in the production of goods, and more are taking part in
these goods’ development. This process is for the large part
responsible for inflation remaining relatively low in the Western
world over the recent years. And thanks to this very same process,
the standard of life in the emerging nations has risen sharply.
We,
as investors, are interested in stock markets. Economic growth is a
wonderful thing, but what we care about are rising share prices, and
the two do not always correspond. The connection between economic
growth and rising stock market prices is a very interesting and far
from self-apparent subject. The fact is, stock prices are not
determined by the economy as a whole, but by the profitability of
companies whose shares are traded on the market. Imagine a country
where development occurs mostly thanks to small and medium-sized
private firms whose shares are not publicly traded. This fictional
country also has huge privatized companies whose shares do get traded
on the exchanges. But to the great disappointment of investors, the
management of these companies turned out to be incompetent and
corrupt, and these companies see no profits. So, this country’s
gross domestic production grows, while the stock prices stay put.
You may think that this is a theoretical example that has no
precedent in real life. This is not quite the case: in our next
program, we will discuss one country where things just about followed
this scenario.
But
with this, we will have to draw today’s program to a close.
This was Sergey Zaks. Thank you for your attention and until next
time.
©2007 Zaks Investment Advisory Service, LLC. All rights reserved.
|