|
What Are the Prospects of BRIC Nations’ Growth?
We concluded our last
program by posing the following two questions: what are the
prospects of future BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) nations’
economic growth, and are there other emerging markets outside BRIC
that might be of interest to us?
I
hope that my listeners understand that it is impossible to give a
definitive answer to the first question. No one knows for sure how
the BRIC nations’ financial markets will look in the future.
However, we could still lay out a few thoughts on the matter. To
begin with, let us determine what caused these nations’ stock
exchanges to enjoy such strong recent growth. There are two reasons
behind this. First of all, they started off from very low levels.
Secondly, all of these countries launched, with varying degrees of
success, a series of market economic reforms. These reforms
resulted in overall economic growth, relative interest rate
stability, and a rise in individual company profits. At the same
time, as their economies grew and financial markets developed,
investors decided that these countries were no longer as risky as
they had seemed just a few years before. All these factors pushed
up stock prices. Yet it is far from evident that these factors will
continue to play a similar role in the future. First of all,
current price levels on BRIC exchanges are far higher than before.
Let’s take China, for example. Even after suffering a
40-percent fall off their October 2007 records, Chinese stocks still
cannot be considered cheap by most standards. Moreover, current
prices presume that profits of Chinese companies will continue
enjoying rapid growth. Thus, future economic expansion becomes a
vital factor in appraising these nations’ prospects: if growth
doesn’t meet expectations, the market will suffer. But there
are other potential complications. As we know, the stock exchange
values individual companies rather than a country’s gross
domestic product. For stock prices to continue rising, overall
economic growth must lead to higher profitability of individual
companies. This could happen only if the economy achieves a certain
degree of structural maturity.
And
here we have to go back to the reforms BRIC nations undertook in the
1990s. Although these countries’ political structures were
(and remain) completely different, with some keeping to socialism
and others enjoying relative degrees of democracy, in terms of
economy all of them tried to accomplish the same goal: economic
liberalization. But none of these nations succeeded in implementing
reforms all the way through. In China, for example, the state
continues to control numerous enterprises and frequently interferes
in how the market functions. And recently, it froze prices on many
products – this was how Chinese authorities decided to fight
inflation. We, of course, know that inflation cannot be overcome in
this manner – it will only result in a shortage of goods. But
the Chinese authorities, trying with all their might to introduce a
semblance of social harmony, are willing to take these drastic
measures. The Brazilian economy, on the other hand, is more open
and resembles a market one to a far greater degree than China’s,
though it too suffers from state intervention. There, it is
manifested in extremely high taxes. In Russia, the basic taxes are
lower than Brazil’s (the government mostly lives off oil
export tariffs), but the economy suffers from corruption. And, just
like in other BRIC nations, the Russian government will not leave
its economy alone. Corruption leads to an inefficient distribution
of resources, while government intervention – to a significant
drop-off in potential foreign investments. Attempts to expropriate
oil and natural gas fields from foreign companies – or
Domodedovo airport from a Russian one – also do the markets no
favors. Neither does the issue of an arrest warrant for the head of
one of Russia’s first and largest foreign investment
companies. India, meanwhile, has its own problems. I mentioned
that its enormous and quite active bureaucracy, which has ballooned
at both federal and individual state levels, frequently keeps the
country’s economy from developing on its own.
Besides the
above-mentioned problems, there is one other feature inherent to
financial markets of emerging nations: they are not transparent.
Insider trading, which is practiced to a larger or smaller extent on
all leading nation exchanges, scares off many investors and
undercuts stock prices.
All
of these are real problems. But they are also resolvable ones.
Whether the BRIC nations want to overcome them is not something we
can answer. But to a certain extent, these problems are not really
all that grave. Brazil could alter its tax system to make sure that
nearly 70 percent of private company returns do not end up in state
pockets. India could reform its administrative system, simplifying
business rules and disbanding its army of bureaucrats. Russia, if
its society wanted, could create a more transparent system intended
to benefit all rather than just the ruling elite, which currently
controls both the state and gigantic monopolies. China is the least
democratic state of the four and is therefore subject to the highest
political risk. But even there, the government could gradually
democratize both society and the economy. All of these problems
cannot be compared to the ones facing nations such as Albania and
Georgia, which are trying to build economies practically from
scratch.
If
the BRIC nations continue their paths to reform, their growth will
extend into the future. At a certain point, the purchasing power of
the middle class will reach a critical mass and these countries will
be able to rely on domestic demand as an engine for growth, weaning
off their dependence on exports. And at that point, we can safely
predict that their stock exchanges will continue to grow.
Since
we have not had the time to talk about other emerging markets, we
will do so next. But with this, we will draw today’s program
to a close. This was Sergey Zaks. Thank you for your attention and
until next time.
©2008 Zaks Investment Advisory Service, LLC. All rights reserved.
|